Comments on: ScribeFire Test Post #2

By: Robert Hruzek

Robert Hruzek — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:38:25 +0000

T, that’s pretty much where I see ScribeFire’s strength, but it’s not something I would do much, if any.

I’d like to try Windows LiveWriter, but can’t seem to load it. I hear it’s got some great image-handling features. I think I need to update my Windows security updates first, but for some reason, it’s not a simple thing on this computer.

By: William Tully

William Tully — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:41:30 +0000

The only time I found it useful was when I was browsing another site and wanted to grab something to quote in a post. I’d just select the stuff I wanted, send it to ScribeFire, name it, and save it as a draft so that when I was done whatever I was doing, I could go into WP and finish building the post.

That was about the only use I found for it. Now, Windoes LiveWriter on the other hand is pure offline blog posting! I haven’t used it in a while because I was using a really early version which eventually crapped out, however, I have the recent version and just might have to put it back on the system. Oh yeah, it also has some useful plugins too..

By: Robert Hruzek

Robert Hruzek — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:15:32 +0000

Jon: I might have to try that sometime, but in the meantime, I don’t really see that much value in using it. Oh, well.

Joanna: Intriguing idea; maybe you should try it and see! Make it an application of the Uncertainty Principle…

By: jon

jon — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:48 +0000

but maybe these are test comments, offered in uncertainty.

By: Joanna Young

Joanna Young — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:14:02 +0000

I’m so intrigued by this idea. What happens if you call everything test post? Does it allow you to be more playful and creative? Do we carry on replying anyway? Looks like it!

By: jon

jon — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:23:51 +0000

I’ve used scribefire while NOT connected to the internet. Saved as a note, and then published later. Worked great.