<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assumptions and Risk Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://middlezonemusings.com/assumptions-and-risk-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/assumptions-and-risk-management/</link>
	<description>It's about lessons learned... from life!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Risk Management</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/assumptions-and-risk-management/#comment-6695</link>
		<dc:creator>Risk Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/assumptions-and-risk-management/#comment-6695</guid>
		<description>i think its better to be safe than sorry, no matter the case :/
-Jennay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think its better to be safe than sorry, no matter the case :/<br />
-Jennay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hruzek</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/assumptions-and-risk-management/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hruzek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/assumptions-and-risk-management/#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I don't know, Tully - we might call the risk with a potential positive impact by some other term (windfall, reward, serendipity, etc.), but it's still a risk - and maybe (?) should be managed as well. (e.g. What if you DO get that raise - or inheritance, etc.? What's your plan for spending it wisely?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But going back to the crane example, I'm talking about managing the risk of something not going as &lt;i&gt;planned&lt;/i&gt;. In other words, &lt;i&gt;planning&lt;/i&gt; manages &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; of the risk, but what we commonly call "risk management" is how we plan for times when those plans don't go as, uh, &lt;i&gt;planned&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I don&#8217;t know, Tully - we might call the risk with a potential positive impact by some other term (windfall, reward, serendipity, etc.), but it&#8217;s still a risk - and maybe (?) should be managed as well. (e.g. What if you DO get that raise - or inheritance, etc.? What&#8217;s your plan for spending it wisely?)</p>
<p>But going back to the crane example, I&#8217;m talking about managing the risk of something not going as <i>planned</i>. In other words, <i>planning</i> manages <i>some</i> of the risk, but what we commonly call &#8220;risk management&#8221; is how we plan for times when those plans don&#8217;t go as, uh, <i>planned</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Tully</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/assumptions-and-risk-management/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>William Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/assumptions-and-risk-management/#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>I think the big challenge is that assumptions are beliefs with a currently unproven truth to them, whereas a risk is a potential negative impact on something in the immediate or near future. You can have good or bad assumptions, yet you can only have negative risk. 

Do we only focus on the negative aspects of everything and try to manage them? Isn't simply being AWARE (and educated) of the risks of something, yet making sure you don't find yourself in such a position a better practice?

Take your crane example. Yes there is a risk that the crane for a project might not be available when you need it. It would be bad to make the assumption that it will or will not be there simply because it is a belief with a "wait and see" action tied to it. Being aware of this risk though, one can then take action to ensure that you won't be in the position of being without the crane when you need it most. 

When it comes to risk management, when do you stop asking the "what if" questions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the big challenge is that assumptions are beliefs with a currently unproven truth to them, whereas a risk is a potential negative impact on something in the immediate or near future. You can have good or bad assumptions, yet you can only have negative risk. </p>
<p>Do we only focus on the negative aspects of everything and try to manage them? Isn&#8217;t simply being AWARE (and educated) of the risks of something, yet making sure you don&#8217;t find yourself in such a position a better practice?</p>
<p>Take your crane example. Yes there is a risk that the crane for a project might not be available when you need it. It would be bad to make the assumption that it will or will not be there simply because it is a belief with a &#8220;wait and see&#8221; action tied to it. Being aware of this risk though, one can then take action to ensure that you won&#8217;t be in the position of being without the crane when you need it most. </p>
<p>When it comes to risk management, when do you stop asking the &#8220;what if&#8221; questions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assumptions and Risk Management at Eye Care</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/assumptions-and-risk-management/#comment-2093</link>
		<dc:creator>Assumptions and Risk Management at Eye Care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/assumptions-and-risk-management/#comment-2093</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve put a link to this article here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve put a link to this article here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
