<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Logic Bomb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/</link>
	<description>It's about lessons learned... from life!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guess Who Left The 1000th Comment On My Blog? - Dawud Miracle @ dmiracle.com - (formerly Healthy WebDesign)</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Guess Who Left The 1000th Comment On My Blog? - Dawud Miracle @ dmiracle.com - (formerly Healthy WebDesign)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>[...] A Logic Bomb [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Logic Bomb [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markk suspected of commenting on other blogs &#171; My Opinions Are Important</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Markk suspected of commenting on other blogs &#171; My Opinions Are Important</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>[...] March 29th, 2007 &#183; No Comments  Yes, I do leave comments on other blogs, occasionally. Such as Middle Zone Musings, which asked, &#8220;What is the opposite of the word not?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] March 29th, 2007 &middot; No Comments  Yes, I do leave comments on other blogs, occasionally. Such as Middle Zone Musings, which asked, &#8220;What is the opposite of the word not?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hruzek</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hruzek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>It is not that I understand clearly, but that I do not clearly understand. I think. &lt;i&gt;(sound of head exploding)&lt;/i&gt;

Gee, and Bill Clinton was worried about leaving a legacy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not that I understand clearly, but that I do not clearly understand. I think. <i>(sound of head exploding)</i></p>
<p>Gee, and Bill Clinton was worried about leaving a legacy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markk</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Markk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-442</guid>
		<description>This is not a question that does not interest me, as you can see. I could say "is", but then we would have to debate on what the definition of "is" is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a question that does not interest me, as you can see. I could say &#8220;is&#8221;, but then we would have to debate on what the definition of &#8220;is&#8221; is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hruzek</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hruzek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Hey, not bad, Ilker! That's why we call you "the thinker", don'tcha know? =)

You got more? Keep going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, not bad, Ilker! That&#8217;s why we call you &#8220;the thinker&#8221;, don&#8217;tcha know? =)</p>
<p>You got more? Keep going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilker</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>ilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-437</guid>
		<description>hmm.. let me see:

certainly, definitely, exactly, surely, precisely...

want more? =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm.. let me see:</p>
<p>certainly, definitely, exactly, surely, precisely&#8230;</p>
<p>want more? =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chipping the web - par for the course -- Chip&#8217;s Quips</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Chipping the web - par for the course -- Chip&#8217;s Quips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-426</guid>
		<description>[...] Not not. Who&#8217;s dare? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not not. Who&#8217;s dare? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hruzek</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hruzek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Well, that's an interesting one, Pete. Got a stopwatch? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s an interesting one, Pete. Got a stopwatch? <img src='http://middlezonemusings.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Aldin</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Aldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-424</guid>
		<description>I think the opposite of "not" is a short pause of 13 milliseconds where it would have been inserted in a sentence or phrase but now is ... not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the opposite of &#8220;not&#8221; is a short pause of 13 milliseconds where it would have been inserted in a sentence or phrase but now is &#8230; not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hruzek</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hruzek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Karin, Sam; both good answers! Let's see if there are any other takers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karin, Sam; both good answers! Let&#8217;s see if there are any other takers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>That's a pretty tough one... since "not" has so many different ways it can be used, it doesn't precisely have ONE SINGLE opposite. Since "not" is just a negative, I think the best approach is to simply say that the opposite of "not" is "not not," thereby turning whatever initial negative you have into its positive opposite every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a pretty tough one&#8230; since &#8220;not&#8221; has so many different ways it can be used, it doesn&#8217;t precisely have ONE SINGLE opposite. Since &#8220;not&#8221; is just a negative, I think the best approach is to simply say that the opposite of &#8220;not&#8221; is &#8220;not not,&#8221; thereby turning whatever initial negative you have into its positive opposite every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karin H.</title>
		<link>http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Karin H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middlezonemusings.com/a-logic-bomb/#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Hi Bob

The best opposite I like is: &lt;strong&gt;Sure&lt;/strong&gt;
(is rather an 'inbetween' option, still can go either way ;-))

or: "Absolutely can do!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob</p>
<p>The best opposite I like is: <strong>Sure</strong><br />
(is rather an &#8216;inbetween&#8217; option, still can go either way ;-))</p>
<p>or: &#8220;Absolutely can do!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
