Collaboration? Or Just Plain Lazy?
If you're new around these parts, I just want to say how much I appreciate your dropping by! Oh, and you may want to subscribe to my feed. Thanks, and a tip o' the hat to ya!
Jeremy Wagstaff of Loose Wire Blog made an observation from a somewhat different point of view about how university students are apparently using borrowing appropriating stealing each other’s material when writing their student application forms. A study found that quite a large percentage used the same anecdotes and phrases, indicating a common source. (It’s worth the three minutes it will take to read his post. No worries, I’ll wait.)
While I can’t imagine anyone actually being surprised by this revelation, a little farther in the post he says,
“… in other ways, it reflects two things, one positive, one negative:
- the online world favors collaboration and cooperation. Student applicants in a very competitive environment are happy and willing to share their experiences and their material. This is a real community.
- the online world doesn’t necessarily favor originality, creativity or individuality. We have too much prior information, too much of an idea of what the benchmark and received procedure are, so what we do create tends to be bland and unoriginal.”[emphasis mine]
Yeah, right. Nothing like putting a positive spin on things to hide the reality. It’s like praising a successful bank robber because he was able to accomplish such a complex goal as robbing a bank!
Good gosh, there’s so many different ways we could go with this one, I don’t know which one to focus on first! (Augh! Brain freeze! Brain freeze!) So how about let’s start with the emphasized text above (after all, it’s WHY I super-sized emphasized it).
Is it really true that collaboration produces work that’s “bland and unoriginal”? I don’t know about you, but doesn’t that second conclusion simply cry out for debate? (To be completely candid, it really seems to beg a sharp whack on the back of the head.) Oh, but wait, there’s that little qualifier word: “necessarily”.
Now let’s consider the ludicrous conclusion: “I’d say the problem is with the personal statement approach, not unoriginal students desparate to do whatever gets them into medical school.”
Uh, excuse me? Doesn’t this seem more like a comment about the symptom and not the disease? I mean, c’mon Jeremy, why blame the university for the slack attitudes of these student applicants?
Is it really too much to ask that the students, as John Housman in the old E. F. Hutton commercial used to say, “earn it”?
You know, it would just be absolutely finer than a frogs hair if you would subscribe to my RSS feed!





